Event Horizon IQ · Leaderboard

Best calls. Biggest misses. Kept.

Ranked by absolute edge vs the prevailing prediction market at the moment EHIQ posted. The bigger the disagreement with consensus, the bigger the row. Wins and misses both kept on permanent record.

Top wins · biggest correct disagreements

10 wins total
  1. #1
    Stocks (corporate)May 15, 2026

    Drake Iceman Kendrick mention (Kalshi fade)

    EHIQ 50% · market 16% at call · resolved YES

    +34.0pp
    edge
  2. #2
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Iowa Senate D Primary — Turek over Wahls

    EHIQ 66% · market 35% at call · resolved YES

    +31.0pp
    edge
  3. #3
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    LA Mayor — Raman takes #2 runoff slot (over Pratt)

    EHIQ 18% · market 35% at call · resolved YES

    -17.0pp
    edge
  4. #4
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Steve Hilton — CA Governor primary first-place

    EHIQ 25% · market 10% at call · resolved YES

    +15.3pp
    edge
  5. #5
    Legal & SCOTUSMay 18, 2026

    Musk v Altman verdict

    EHIQ 30% · market 40% at call · resolved YES

    -10.0pp
    edge
  6. #6
    ElectionsApr 19, 2026

    Bulgaria — Radev presidential call

    EHIQ 85% · market 95% at call · resolved YES

    -9.5pp
    edge
  7. #7
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    LA mayoral — Karen Bass first-round winner

    EHIQ 43% · market 45% at call · resolved YES

    -2.0pp
    edge
  8. #8
    Stocks (earnings)May 8, 2026

    PSEC Q3 FY26 — Pebbles II confirmation

    EHIQ 75% · market at call · resolved YES

    0.0pp
    edge
  9. #9
    Stocks (earnings)May 7, 2026

    OPEN Q1 FY26 — Reffkin pattern Type A

    EHIQ 70% · market at call · resolved YES

    0.0pp
    edge
  10. #10
    Stocks (earnings)May 6, 2026

    NXDR Q1 FY26 — beat consensus

    EHIQ 75% · market at call · resolved YES

    0.0pp
    edge

Biggest misses · kept on the record

9 misses total

These are the calls EHIQ got most wrong — published with conviction, resolved against us. Not deleted, not relitigated. The list is the receipt that the headline hit rate isn’t cherry-picked.

  1. #1
    Stocks (corporate)May 30, 2026

    Drake Iceman first-week sales (525K call)

    EHIQ 70% · market 50% at call · resolved NO

    Drake Iceman first-week sales settled at ~463K (Polymarket 450K-500K bucket). Call was 525K+ — missed by ~12%.

    +20.0pp
    edge bet wrong
  2. #2
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    LA mayoral — Spencer Pratt first-round winner

    EHIQ 37% · market 18% at call · resolved NO

    Pratt finished 2nd at ~29% (51% counted, 2026-06-02), advancing to the November runoff against Bass. On the LITERAL question — Pratt FIRST-ROUND WINNER — outcome resolved NO. However, the Jun 1 EHIQ analytical update on this race was a three-call package: (a) Bass first-round 0.66 → 0.43, (b) Pratt first-round 0.20 → 0.37, (c) Raman-over-Pratt-for-#2 0.55 → 0.18. Read together, the package's implied directional call was 'Bass 1st, Pratt 2nd' — which is exactly what happened. The Raman-over-Pratt-#2 entry (id=75) carries the formal HIT credit for the Pratt-takes-runoff prediction (correctly faded Polymarket by 17pp). This Pratt first-round entry (id=4) is logged as calibration_note: the +19pp market fade was direction-correct (Pratt was materially more competitive than the market's 18% priced), and the analytical package landed exactly on the 'Bass 1st / Pratt 2nd' outcome. The binary literal claim (Pratt wins 1st) was the magnitude overshoot. The directional revision was right.

    +19.0pp
    edge bet wrong
  3. #3
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Katie Porter — CA Governor primary first-place

    EHIQ 11% · market 1% at call · resolved NO

    Porter conceded the race 2026-06-02 — did not advance to the runoff. EHIQ 11% vs Polymarket 1.4% (EHIQ overweight by 9.6pp). The TIQ signal on Porter overweighted her vs market consensus; market was closer.

    +9.6pp
    edge bet wrong
  4. #4
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Chong Won-oh win (Seoul Mayoral 2026)

    EHIQ 85% · market 93% at call · resolved NO

    Chong Won-o lost 2026 Seoul Mayoral on Jun 3 2026, conceded to incumbent Oh Se-hoon. EHIQ stamp at 85% probability of Chong-win MISSED. SCHOLAR-verified outcome.

    -7.5pp
    edge bet wrong
  5. #5
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Oh Se-hoon retention (Seoul Mayoral 2026)

    EHIQ 15% · market 8% at call · resolved NO

    Oh Se-hoon won 2026 Seoul Mayoral on Jun 3 2026. EHIQ stamp at 15% probability of Oh-win MISSED (actual: Oh won). SCHOLAR-verified outcome.

    +7.5pp
    edge bet wrong
  6. #6
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Matt Mahan — CA Governor primary first-place

    EHIQ 7% · market 2% at call · resolved NO

    Mahan trailing — did not advance to the runoff. EHIQ 7% vs Polymarket 2.2%.

    +4.8pp
    edge bet wrong
  7. #7
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Xavier Becerra — CA Governor primary first-place

    EHIQ 52% · market 49% at call · resolved NO

    Becerra finished 2nd at ~25.8% (51% counted, 2026-06-02), behind Hilton at 26.7%. EHIQ called Becerra first-place at 52% (consensus-confirming vs Polymarket 49%). The call was both EHIQ's and the market's majority view, and both were wrong on the literal first-place outcome — Hilton edged Becerra. Becerra advances to the November runoff in 2nd. Note: final order may shift with late ballots; will revise if Becerra moves into 1st in final tally.

    +2.8pp
    edge bet wrong
  8. #8
    ElectionsJun 3, 2026

    Tom Steyer — CA Governor primary first-place

    EHIQ 35% · market 34% at call · resolved NO

    Steyer finished 3rd at ~19.6% — not first-place. EHIQ 35% vs Polymarket 33.5%. Did not advance to the runoff.

    +1.5pp
    edge bet wrong
  9. #9
    ElectionsMay 31, 2026

    BC Conservative Leadership — Elliott wins

    EHIQ 80% · market 81% at call · resolved NO

    -1.0pp
    edge bet wrong

Calibration notes · right outcome, imperfect rationale

1 total

Calls where EHIQ landed on the right direction but the reasoning that got us there was off in some way. Counted separately from clean hits so the headline hit rate doesn’t silently absorb them.

  1. #1
    Stocks (earnings)May 5, 2026

    DAVE Q1 FY26 — direction right, magnitude calibration

    Direction 8/8 right. Magnitude 5-10% too aggressive on revenue. Calibration: apply sandbagging haircut + 0.7-0.8x conversion factor on alt-data going forward.

    0.0pp
    edge

See /accuracy for the full math, by-category breakdown, and methodology caveats. See /predictions for active calls open right now.

Disclaimer

Published intelligence and analytical research. Not personalized investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security or event contract. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers are responsible for their own decisions.