← All calls
LegalResolved★ featured

Trump v. Cook (No. 25A312) — can the President fire a Fed Governor without cause?

Will the Supreme Court allow President Trump to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook without cause?

EHIQ
30%
(20-42%)
Market
Edge

Thesis

We expect the Court to split the removal-power question rather than decide it as one. The companion FTC case (Slaughter) looks set to let the President fire an agency commissioner and narrow Humphrey's Executor — but we expect the Court to carve out the Federal Reserve as structurally distinct and preserve it from at-will removal. At argument the justices signaled sympathy to Cook, and a ruling that let a President fire a Fed governor at will would be read by markets as the end of central-bank independence — an outcome a majority appears unwilling to author. Most coverage prices the two cases as one removal question; we price them as a deliberate split. There is no clean market on the Cook outcome, which is exactly where the mispricing sits.
  1. 1.We read the removal-power cases as a split, not a single outcome: the FTC firing (Slaughter) likely stands while the Fed (Cook) is walled off.
  2. 2.Argument coverage showed justices sympathetic to Cook; a majority appears unwilling to author the end of at-will Fed independence.
  3. 3.The term shows a two-sided pattern — the Court checked executive overreach on the tariff/IEEPA question (6-3) while upholding immigration enforcement (Mullin) — consistent with shielding a structurally unique Fed here.
  4. 4.No clean prediction market exists on the Cook outcome; the indirect 'Cook out' contracts conflate it with the FTC question.

Resolution

Outcome
Removal blocked 5-4 (Trump v. Cook); Cook stays
Resolved
June 29, 2026

We put 30% on the Court ALLOWING removal — it blocked it 5-4, so our lean (Cook stays) was correct.

Opened
June 27, 2026
Expected resolution
July 1, 2026